Assignment 9
My target audiences for both of my
interpretive essays are my peers and the professors who will be grading my final
portfolio. It was their age, level of education, upbringing, gender, and
knowledge of the topics that I had to keep in mind when writing these two
papers. Thankfully, writing to this audience was not too difficult of a task
because the group discussions gave me a sense of just how much everyone knew
about the two different stories. And they allowed me to hear each and everyone’s
individual response to Standing By
and Lifelike. My own writing works to
build relationships with these people because I took into account all this
necessary information to write a productive essay. Also, my paper was not
radical or reactionary in any way, so anyone can read my paper and understand
the message I am trying to convey without being offended. Or they will not feel
the need to dispute anything I have to say. The majority of my peers’ beliefs
are consistent with what I believe in, so that made writing these two papers a
lot more easy as well than it would have been had I been trying to build a
relationship with a different audience. All of us are academics with the same goal
in mind of achieving a degree, so I think we are better prepared to appreciate
what another person has to say without being too argumentative.
Here is
an example of my efforts to build a relationship with my audience. This is my
introduction for the first interpretive essay.
Everywhere
people go, people judge others based on their occupation, political party
preference, ethnic heritage, appearance, race, religion, gender, creed, and
even the clothes they decide to wear. People may not always be aware that they
do it, and that’s because most people do it subconsciously. Without being
completely aware of what they are doing, people tend to judge others based on
their appearance, match that appearance with a certain stereotype, put that
person in a certain group given the stereotype, and then compare that person to
themself. It’s an innate, human habit that David Sedaris suggest all people may
have and he unveils this idea in his story, “Standing By”. He also brings up
the idea that, perhaps the airport is a forum that allows people to show their
true hateful selves. This is the message I believe Sedaris was trying to get
across to his readers. I believe he wants his readers to think twice before
judging others. I believe he wants his readers to not judge others based on
their appearance. He successfully conveys this message of his story by
recreating an atmosphere that most people can relate to, using humor, using
characters that most can relate to, as well as putting the reader in situations
that are very familiar and hilariously so.
I am
going to include more “I” statements to improve the quality of my paper. In
both of my interpretive papers, I am very well removed from my writing. It is
an interpretive essay, so therefore I need to give my readers a better sense of
who I am and what I have experienced, so that my writing becomes more credible.
1. I'm glad that you position yourself as an academic. It's important that you treat yourself that way, and it's something you should include in your reflective essay; that is how you should be viewing your audience, and I like how you articulate it above.
ReplyDelete2. You make a wonderful connection to Sedaris' text with the course goal and outcome about the ethical dimension of communication. That's a sophisticated way to connect the reflective course goals and outcomes to what you're writing about in your critical interpretive essays.
3. Definitely add more of yourself in the essay. Develop your ethos so your writing stands apart from the other students' writing.