Assignment 8
I wasn’t actually all that
surprised by my fellow students reactions to Lifelike. We all seemed to formulate the same ideas and opinions
about the article. For example, many of us were very confused about her
decision to integrate many disturbing quotes into her essay and at the same
time, compliment many of the taxidermists for their skillfulness, hard work,
and dedication. This made her whole article very difficult to understand.
Nobody knew what to think after reading through it. We did not know whether she
gained an appreciation for taxidermy or whether she added those disturbing
quotes so that her readers’ beliefs would be reconfirmed. Additionally, she made many other writerly
choices that raised a lot of questions. For instance, why did she write about
the history of taxidermy, why did she write about the taxidermy site, why did she
write about all the different people who take up taxidermy, or why did she make
a biblical reference at the end of her essay? All these different writerly
choices raised a lot of questions. Her reasons for doing any of this did not
seem clear. But once I read Lifelike
many times over and over, it finally started to make since. She wrote this
article to support and promote taxidermy.
She did include in her essay many
quotes that seemed very disturbing, but she only did this because she wanted to
give an accurate description of the environment she was in. She also did not
want to lose her credibility as an author. The
New Yorker audience would probably be a lot less inclined to read her
article if they knew she was biased. If her audience wanted a more biased
article they would have chosen to read something written by the PETA
organization or the NRA organization. But because she seems so impartial, she
does not lose her credibility as an author. Despite the fact that she included
these quotes, which may at first make her seem impartial, I think she was not being
impartial and that she was promoting taxidermy through her writing.
There is one more thing I would
like to comment on and that is that she wrote this paper because she simply
loves to write. I listened to a speech she once gave to a group of people that
is viewable on You Tube and in that speech she said that she loves to write
because she loves telling stories and providing her readers with a more in
depth look at whatever it is that she is writing about. Although, the internet
can provide us with all the information we need to learn about anything, she
can offer so much more. She can give us a beautifully written story filled with
emotion and feeling, and not just a list of facts.
Ryan, I love that you found that speech. (It makes me really happy as a teacher that you're actively looking for things to understand the text and that you're curious about things.) I know you already wrote an essay for "Lifelike," but it would be crazy sweet to see a critical interpretive essay connecting what Orlean says in that speech to her writerly choices. Just something to think about...
ReplyDelete